Is Mofang Living profitable in 2026?

No. As of March 15, 2026, Mofang and affiliates were defaulting on rent to landlords across multiple Chinese cities through 2025-2026 and losing control of numerous properties, indicating an active, unresolved liquidity crisis rather than profitability.

Who owns Mofang Living?

Warburg Pincus is the largest shareholder with a reported ~42.56% stake in the IPO entity Cubic City, followed by CDPQ at ~16.93% and AVIC Industry-Finance at ~12.59%, according to a May 12, 2023 report on the company's IPO filing.

Is Mofang Living going public?

Mofang, under the name Cubic City Service Apartment Group Holdings Ltd., filed for a Hong Kong IPO in 2022-2023 and refiled afterward, but as of April 6, 2025 had not completed a listing despite a strong Hong Kong IPO market.

Is it risky to be a tenant or landlord dealing with Mofang Living?

Yes. In Shenzhen, at least four Mofang/V Ke Youth apartments had tenants lose power in August 2024 after Mofang failed to pay landlords for 5-6 months, and a Guangzhou landlord reported over 600,000 yuan in arrears since H2 2025.

Who is Mofang Living's biggest competitor?

Ziroom is cited as a larger peer in China's centralized rental sector as of April 2025, while institutional capital like Brookfield, which bought a Shanghai rental-housing project in 2022, is also entering the same space.

Could AI replace Mofang Living's business?

No structural AI threat is identified. Mofang's core value and liability sit in physical real estate control and landlord contracts, not software; its documented crisis as of March 2026 is financial (rent defaults), not technological displacement.

China · China

Mofang Living

Chinese long-term apartment rental operator leasing units from landlords and subletting to tenants.

Little protection left

Assessed 29 July 2026 · Evidence as of 29 July 2026

Not much stands between this business and its pressures.

On the recordSince 29 July 2026 · Checkable from H2 2026 · Every call on the record Checkpoint: Next landlord-default report following Caixin's March 2026 coverage, showing whether losses spread or stop

The call

Mofang's problem is unpaid rent to its own landlords, not AI or a single rival; whether its backers recapitalize it or let the leased portfolio unwind is still open.

Mofang Living rents apartments from landlords, then subleases them to tenants for profit. The company is not losing money to a new competitor or to AI, it is running out of cash right now and has stopped paying rent to landlords across China. Bigger rival Ziroom and global investor Brookfield are watching. The key question: over the next six months, does the company stabilize and stop losing properties to unpaid landlords, or do losses accelerate? If losses spread, the company may not survive.

Why

AI pressure: None apparent. This is a cash and rent-arbitrage business; AI tools don't change the math between landlord rent and tenant income. Could AI do the core job? Only partly.

Bigger players: Ziroom, plus institutional capital like Brookfield entering China's rental market. Ziroom operates the same leased-apartment model at larger scale while Mofang defaults on landlords and loses properties. Could a giant copy it? Yes, easily.

What protects it. Backing from Warburg Pincus, CDPQ, and AVIC, which could still fund a recapitalization or IPO if they choose to.

What would change this call

Whether Mofang completes a Hong Kong IPO under the Cubic City name at or above the $1.5B 2019 valuation. Would show fresh capital exists to clear landlord arrears and stabilize operations.
Next Caixin or similar report on landlord rent-default counts following March 2026. Shows whether property losses are spreading further or have stopped.
Any audited disclosure of what share of Mofang's portfolio is in landlord arrears. Would clarify if defaults are contained or portfolio-wide.

Key numbers

Guangzhou landlord owed 600,000+ yuan in unpaid rent (H2 2025)
Shenzhen tenants lost power after 5-6 months of unpaid rent (2024-08-27)
Total funding raised reported at $710 million (2026-03-15)

Named risks

Ongoing rent defaults and loss of leased properties across multiple Chinese cities through 2025-2026. Severity: high
Two failed Hong Kong IPO attempts despite favorable 2025 IPO market conditions. Severity: high
Softening Chinese rental market inverting the spread between landlord obligations and tenant income. Severity: high
Tenant service disruptions, including power cutoffs, from unpaid landlord rent. Severity: medium
No independently confirmed audited financials since core figures rely on unconfirmed vendor sites. Severity: medium

Rivals, as read in July 2026

Rival	Direction	Evidence
Ziroom	losing to	Cited as larger peer in centralized rental sector as of 2025-04-06
Brookfield	losing to	Bought a Shanghai rental-housing project in 2022, entering the same sector with institutional capital
Anxin Apartment	contesting	Listed as direct alternative/competitor by CB Insights comparison data
XiaoZhu	contesting	Listed as direct alternative/competitor by CB Insights comparison data
Sweetome	contesting	Listed as direct alternative/competitor by CB Insights comparison data

Questions people ask

Is Mofang Living profitable in 2026?: No. As of March 15, 2026, Mofang and affiliates were defaulting on rent to landlords across multiple Chinese cities through 2025-2026 and losing control of numerous properties, indicating an active, unresolved liquidity crisis rather than profitability.
Who owns Mofang Living?: Warburg Pincus is the largest shareholder with a reported ~42.56% stake in the IPO entity Cubic City, followed by CDPQ at ~16.93% and AVIC Industry-Finance at ~12.59%, according to a May 12, 2023 report on the company's IPO filing.
Is Mofang Living going public?: Mofang, under the name Cubic City Service Apartment Group Holdings Ltd., filed for a Hong Kong IPO in 2022-2023 and refiled afterward, but as of April 6, 2025 had not completed a listing despite a strong Hong Kong IPO market.
Is it risky to be a tenant or landlord dealing with Mofang Living?: Yes. In Shenzhen, at least four Mofang/V Ke Youth apartments had tenants lose power in August 2024 after Mofang failed to pay landlords for 5-6 months, and a Guangzhou landlord reported over 600,000 yuan in arrears since H2 2025.
Who is Mofang Living's biggest competitor?: Ziroom is cited as a larger peer in China's centralized rental sector as of April 2025, while institutional capital like Brookfield, which bought a Shanghai rental-housing project in 2022, is also entering the same space.
Could AI replace Mofang Living's business?: No structural AI threat is identified. Mofang's core value and liability sit in physical real estate control and landlord contracts, not software; its documented crisis as of March 2026 is financial (rent defaults), not technological displacement.

Timeline

2026-03-15Rent defaults and property losses across multiple Chinese cities reported through 2025-2026, per Caixin digest
2025-04-06Refiled Hong Kong IPO under Cubic City name still not completed
2024-08-27Shenzhen tenants lose power after Mofang fails to pay landlords rent for 5-6 months
2023-05-12Cubic City IPO filing discloses Warburg Pincus 42.56% stake, CDPQ 16.93%, AVIC 12.59%
2022Brookfield buys a Shanghai rental-housing project, signaling institutional competition
2019Series D of $150 million led by CDPQ; valuation reaches $1.5 billion
2016AVIC Trust invests $300 million
2009Mofang founded in Nanjing, China

Revision history

29 July 2026

First assessed. Little protection left. The text above is fixed as of this date and is not edited afterwards.

In the same band

JOLLY Information Technology DeepBlue Technology 56PINGTAI