OpenEvidence
Free, ad-supported AI clinical search tool used by verified physicians for point-of-care answers.
OpenEvidence leads physician AI use today on licensed content and doctor-only access, while a Doximity lawsuit and an EU pullback sit as open questions.
OpenEvidence makes a search tool for doctors that pulls from top medical journals and research, helping them find current, trustworthy information fast. It is hard to copy because the company has signed deals with major medical publishers (like NEJM and JAMA) that stop others from using that same content for free, and it checks that users are real doctors, which AI chatbots cannot easily do. Doximity, a competitor with a similar business model of reaching doctors through ads, could threaten it if they build something similar, and free AI tools like ChatGPT might eventually get good enough that doctors stop paying. The one thing that could change everything is if doctors lose trust in OpenEvidence, either through mistakes in the information it shows or controversy over what medical content it promotes, because the entire business depends on physicians choosing to use it by word of mouth.
Whether Epic or Oracle-Cerner announces exclusive AI integration excluding OpenEvidence. Would show EHR vendor lock-out threatening OpenEvidence's distribution moat.
Any follow-up peer-reviewed study after the Nature Medicine benchmarking on OpenEvidence accuracy versus frontier models. Would show whether trust-based flywheel is eroding due to accuracy concerns.
- $210M Series B at $3.5B valuation
- $200M Series C at $6B valuation
- 650,000 to 760,000 US physician users
- Nature Medicine study (June 2026) questions clinical accuracy versus frontier AI models.
- Ad-based model criticized for enabling pay-to-play promotion of fringe medical content.
- Active federal litigation with Doximity over trade secrets and privacy claims since Sept 2025.
- EU AI Act high-risk classification blocked market access, full rules apply Aug 2026.
- Dependence on EHR vendors like Epic and Oracle-Cerner for workflow integration.
| Rival | Direction | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Doximity | contesting | Federal trade secret suit filed 2025-09, same physician-ad model, 13% YoY growth vs OpenEvidence's ~1,800% |
| UpToDate (Wolters Kluwer) | gaining on | OpenEvidence's free ad model grew ARR to ~$150M by Nov 2025 while UpToDate stays subscription-locked |
| Frontier models (ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude) | contesting | Benchmarked directly against OpenEvidence in June 2026 Nature Medicine study |
| Vera Health and Tandem Health | gaining on | Positioned as EU/UK alternatives after OpenEvidence's April 28 2026 regional withdrawal |
| Abridge, Ambience, Freed, Suki | contesting | Face free competing scribe tool after OpenEvidence's Visits launch in August 2025 |
- Is OpenEvidence profitable in 2026?
- No profit figures are disclosed. Third-party estimates from Sacra put annualized revenue at about $150M by November 2025, up from $7.9M in December 2024, with roughly 90% gross margins, but OpenEvidence has not published audited profitability data.
- Who owns OpenEvidence?
- OpenEvidence is privately held, founded by Daniel Nadler and Zachary Ziegler. It is venture-backed by Sequoia, Google Ventures, Kleiner Perkins, Thrive Capital, DST Global, Nvidia, Meritech and Mayo Clinic, reaching a $12B valuation after its Series D in January 2026.
- Who is OpenEvidence's biggest competitor?
- Doximity (NYSE: DOCS) is OpenEvidence's closest rival, sharing the same physician-ad revenue model. As of January 2026 Doximity had an $8.75B market cap and about $620M TTM revenue growing 13% YoY, versus OpenEvidence's roughly 1,800% YoY growth; the two are in active federal litigation since 2025.
- Could AI chatbots like ChatGPT replace OpenEvidence?
- A June 2026 Nature Medicine study directly benchmarked OpenEvidence against GPT-5.2, Gemini 3.1 Pro and Claude Opus 4.6, yet a July 2026 Stanford-Harvard 'NOHARM' study found physicians chose OpenEvidence over all three combined when given free choice, per company-reported findings.
- How many physicians use OpenEvidence?
- NBC News reported 650,000 to 760,000 U.S. physician users between December 2025 and May 2026, roughly 40-60% of the physician population, plus 1.2 million international users, up from over 100,000 users in early 2025.
- What is OpenEvidence worth?
- OpenEvidence was valued at $12B after its Series D round in January 2026, co-led by Thrive Capital and DST Global. A secondary market transaction in March 2026 reportedly valued the company around $14.8B, according to TrueUp.
- 2026-07-20Stanford-Harvard NOHARM study reports physicians prefer OpenEvidence over combined rival chatbots
- 2026-06-16Nature Medicine study challenges OpenEvidence's accuracy versus frontier AI models
- 2026-04-28OpenEvidence voluntarily withdraws from EU and UK markets over AI Act rules
- 2026-03-26OpenEvidence launches AI medical coding feature within Visits
- 2026-03-17Founder Daniel Nadler says company has sub-100 employees at Nvidia GTC
- 2026-02-26Dialer, a HIPAA-secure calling and messaging suite, gets wide release
- 2026-01Series D raises $250M at $12B valuation, led by Thrive Capital and DST Global
- 2025-10-20Series C raises $200M at $6B valuation led by Google Ventures
- 2025-08-20OpenEvidence launches Visits, an AI medical scribe
- 2025-02-19Series A closes at $1B valuation with NEJM content partnership
- Yahoo Finance/PRNewswire (2025-02-19)
- PRNewswire (2025-07-15)
- TechCrunch (2025-10-20)
- Crustdata (2026-06-23)
- TrueUp (2026-06-29)
- Sacra (2025-07-16)
- NBC News (2026-05-13)
- Sacra (2026-03-09)
- PRNewswire (2026-07-20)
- Fortune (2026-03-17)
- Substack: Regulatory Burden or Strategic Exit? (2026-04-29)
- OpenEvidence (2025-08-20)